Global Learning
  • Home
  • Defenders of Cuban Socialism
    • UN Charter
    • Declaration of Human Rights
    • Bandung
    • New International Economic Order
    • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Substack editorial column
  • New Cold War articles
  • Friends of Socialist China articles
  • Global Research articles
  • Counterpunch articles
  • Cuba and the world-system
    • Table of Contents and chapter summaries
    • About the author
    • Endorsements
    • Obtaining your copy
  • Blog ¨The View from the South¨
    • Blog Index
    • Posts in reverse chronological order
  • The Voice of Third World Leaders
    • Asia >
      • Ho Chi Minh
      • Xi Jinping, President of China
    • Africa >
      • Kwame Nkrumah
      • Julius Nyerere
    • Latin America >
      • Fidel Castro
      • Hugo Chávez
      • Raúl Castro >
        • 55th anniversary speech, January 1, 1914
        • Opening Speech, CELAC
        • Address at G-77, June 15, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, July 5, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, December 20, 2014
        • Speech on Venezuela at ALBA, 3-17-2015
        • Declaration of December 18, 2015 on USA-Cuba relations
        • Speech at ALBA, March 5, 2018
      • Miguel Díaz-Canel >
        • UN address, September 26, 2018
        • 100th annivesary, CP of China
      • Evo Morales >
        • About Evo Morales
        • Address to G-77 plus China, January 8, 2014
        • Address to UN General Assembly, September 24, 2014
      • Rafael Correa >
        • About Rafael Correa
        • Speech at CELAC 1/29/2015
        • Speech at Summit of the Americas 2015
      • Nicolás Maduro
      • Cristina Fernández
      • Cuban Ministry of Foreign Relations >
        • Statement at re-opening of Cuban Embassy in USA, June 20, 2015
        • The visit of Barack Obama to Cuba
        • Declaration on parliamentary coup in Brazil, August 31, 2016
        • Declaration of the Revolutionary Government of Cuba on Venezuela, April 13, 2019
      • ALBA >
        • Declaration of ALBA Political Council, May 21, 2019
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 17, 2015
        • Declaration on Venezuela, April 10, 2017
      • Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) >
        • Havana Declaration 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 26
    • Martin Luther King, Jr.
    • International >
      • Peoples’ Summit 2015
      • The Group of 77 >
        • Declaration on a New World Order 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela 3/26/2015
      • BRICS
      • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Readings
    • Charles McKelvey, Cuba in Global Context
    • Piero Gleijeses, Cuba and Africa
    • Charles McKelvey, Chávez and the Revolution in Venezuela
    • Charles McKelvey, The unfinished agenda of race in USA
    • Charles McKelvey, Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist Revolutionary
  • Recommended Books
  • Contact

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Recommended books on Amazon.com; click on image of book to connect

Utopian socialism in the USA

8/6/2015

0 Comments

 
Posted August 10, 2015

​     In reflecting on Cliff DuRand’s support of cooperatives in Cuba (see “Cooperatives and social change in Cuba” 8/7/2015), it seemed to me that DuRand’s view reflects a subtle form of utopian socialism.  In formulating historical materialism, Marx endeavored to place socialist thought on a scientific foundation.  He envisioned a transition to socialism on the basis of empirical observation of possibilities contained in existing economic and political conditions.  After Marx, socialist thought could move beyond a utopian and idealist vision for humanity and project a real possibility through the practical resolution of contradictions in the existing political-economic system.  But DuRand, in advocating the expansion of cooperatives and the reduction of state property and small-scale private party, is advocating a direction for the future of the socialist project on the basis of idealist conceptions and not on the basis of real challenges and possibilities in Cuba.

     To be sure, cooperatives are a part of the Cuban socialist project, developed in agriculture in the 1960s, expanded in the agricultural sector in the 1990s, and expanded to non-agricultural sectors in the new economic and social model of 2012.  But DuRand’s idealist view of cooperatives causes him to exaggerate the role of the cooperatives in the new social and economic model, and to misinterpret the evolution of the Cuban revolutionary project from 1959 to the present.  In my last post, I attempted to describe the new social and economic model in a form that is more consistent with the constantly evolving Cuban empirical social reality (“Cooperatives and social change in Cuba” 8/7/2015).

     Utopian socialism has a long history in the United States.  During the nineteenth century, concentration of ownership of the means of production led to growing popular awareness that that the US economic system functioned for the benefit of the few and ignored the welfare of the people.  In this economic and ideological context, Robert Owen, a Welsh factory owner, and Charles Fourier, a French entrepreneur, proposed the development of cooperative communities, which would remove ownership and control from a handful of capitalists.  They and their followers in the United States believed that capitalists could be persuaded to invest in cooperative communities, since it was the best way to avoid a revolution from below stimulated by the working class (Foner 1975:170-72).

     Robert Owen came to the United States in 1825.  He addressed the House of Representatives on two occasions, which included the attendance of the president, the president-elect, and heads of departments.  His frequent addresses across the nation were fully reported in the US press.  From 1825 to 1827, nineteen Owenite communities were established in New York, Ohio and Indiana (Foner 1975: 173).  

     Fourier’s ideas also had significant influence in the United States.  His greatest disciple in the United States, Albert Brisbane, disseminated his ideas in various books and articles and in the columns of the New York Tribune, founded by Horace Greeley, in the early 1840s.  Fourierism had thousands of adherents, and forty Fourierist communities was established across the nation.  The most famous of them, Brook Farm, counted among its associates the intellectual giants of the time, including Ralph Waldo Emerson and Nathaniel Hawthorne (Foner 1975:174-77).

      The Owenite and Fourierist communities failed.  Their principle problem was the inability to attract sufficient capital for investment (Foner 1975:173, 177-78).  During the 1840s and 1850s, in spite of the practical failure of their project, the utopian advocates of cooperative communities had significant influence in the working class movement.  Utopians were opposed to the reform of capitalism, and thus they were against the strategy of striking to increase wages and reduce labor hours, even when this was understood as integral to a long-term transition to socialism.  They tried to convince workers that anything less than the total and immediate abolition of capitalism would have no positive effect.  Middle class reformers often entered the working class organizations and took control of them, undermining political and social action in defense of workers’ needs (Foner 1975:188-90, 206, 211).

      But middle class utopianism was on the decline, unable to deliver on its promises, as a result of the refusal of the capitalist class to cooperate in its vision.  At the same time, producers’ cooperatives, formed from below by workers, were economically impossible, as a result of the ruthless competition practiced by the largest capitalist enterprises, as we will see in the next post.  

     But another approach was emerging.  During the 1840s, a permanent class of factory workers began to develop.  Permanent factory workers began to forge a movement that sought to bring the advances of industrialization to workers through political and economic struggle and united action.  Against the utopians, they understood that the interests of capitalists and workers were in conflict, and that the organization by workers was necessary for the attainment of a better life.

      The working class organizations formed by workers, seeking improvement in conditions through the strike, was a force that, distinct from cooperative communities, could not be ignored; and distinct from workers’ cooperatives, could not be defeated and eliminated.  During the course of more than a century, the factory owners were compelled to make reformist concessions to this force from below, which, however, preserved the essence of the capitalist system.

      We can understand today that the reformist concessions in the United States and other core nations were made possible by the superexploitation of vast regions of the planet, which would become politically unsustainable by the 1960s.  And they were in part financed by government deficit spending, which reached its limits during the 1970s.  Thus the reform of the capitalist system in response to the demands of organized workers ultimately would not be a sustainable resolution of the contradictions of the capitalist world-economy.

     That US capitalists would not support a transition from concentrated private ownership to cooperative communities could not be known in the 1840s.  It could be imagined as a reasonable option, emerging as a resolution of the contradictions of the capitalist system, which generates a permanent class war.  But during the second half of the nineteenth century, in the era of the Robber Barons, the capitalist class demonstrated that it was prepared to use all methods, legal or not, peaceful or not, in its quest to stabilize a high margin of profits, even at the expense of the good of the nation in the long run.  And since 1980, the capitalist class has demonstrated that it is prepared to put the survival of humanity at risk in the aggressive pursuit of short-term profits.  So at the present time, it would be idealist and utopian to believe that the capitalist class would possibly cooperate in the development of a more just and democratic world-system.  We can only conclude that the capitalist class must be dislodged from political power by popular movement, if political stability in the world-system is to be attained and the survival of humanity ensured.

     Although utopianism and cooperatives demonstrated their lack of viability in the nineteenth century, they continued to survive in the form of idealist hopes of the people.  They were manifest in the hippie communal movement of the late 1960s and in the localism of the Occupy Movement today.   We must, however, follow the example of Marx.  We must seek to overcome the temptations of utopianism and to be scientific in our understanding, basing our projections on real possibilities.  The example of Cuba is instructive in this regard.  In Cuba, the popular revolution first took control of the state, and then proceeded to develop cooperatives along with other forms of property, both private and state, in accordance with real needs and possibilities, as we will discuss in the next post.  Rather that supporting cooperatives in Cuba as against the other forms of property developed by the Cuban Revolution, we should follow the example of Cuba: we should form in our own nation a popular movement that seeks to take power and to subsequently develop forms of property that are real possibilities and that respond to the material and cultural needs of our people.

References

Foner, Philip S.  1975.  History of the Labor Movement in the United States, Volume I: From Colonial Times to the Founding of the American Federation of Labor.  New York: International Publishers.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author: Charles McKelvey

    Retired professor, writer,  and Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist revolutionary

    Categories

    All
    American Revolution
    Blog Index
    Bolivia
    Charismatic Leaders
    China
    Critique Of The Left
    Cuban History
    Cuba Today
    Ecuador
    Environment
    French Revolution
    Gay Rights
    Haitian Revolution
    Knowledge
    Latin American History
    Latin American Right
    Latin American Unity
    Marx
    Marxism-Leninism
    Mexican Revolution
    Miscellaneous
    Neocolonialism
    Neoliberalism
    Nicaragua
    North-South Cooperation
    Presidential Elections 2016
    Press
    Public Debate In USA
    Race
    Religion And Revolution
    Revolution
    Russian Revolution
    South-South Cooperation
    Third World
    Trump
    US Ascent
    US Imperialism
    Vanguard
    Venezuela
    Vietnam
    Wallerstein
    Women And Revolution
    World History
    World-System
    World-System Crisis

    Archives

    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

More Ads


website by Sierra Creation