Global Learning
  • Home
  • Defenders of Cuban Socialism
    • UN Charter
    • Declaration of Human Rights
    • Bandung
    • New International Economic Order
    • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Substack editorial column
  • New Cold War articles
  • Friends of Socialist China articles
  • Global Research articles
  • Counterpunch articles
  • Cuba and the world-system
    • Table of Contents and chapter summaries
    • About the author
    • Endorsements
    • Obtaining your copy
  • Blog ¨The View from the South¨
    • Blog Index
    • Posts in reverse chronological order
  • The Voice of Third World Leaders
    • Asia >
      • Ho Chi Minh
      • Xi Jinping, President of China
    • Africa >
      • Kwame Nkrumah
      • Julius Nyerere
    • Latin America >
      • Fidel Castro
      • Hugo Chávez
      • Raúl Castro >
        • 55th anniversary speech, January 1, 1914
        • Opening Speech, CELAC
        • Address at G-77, June 15, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, July 5, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, December 20, 2014
        • Speech on Venezuela at ALBA, 3-17-2015
        • Declaration of December 18, 2015 on USA-Cuba relations
        • Speech at ALBA, March 5, 2018
      • Miguel Díaz-Canel >
        • UN address, September 26, 2018
        • 100th annivesary, CP of China
      • Evo Morales >
        • About Evo Morales
        • Address to G-77 plus China, January 8, 2014
        • Address to UN General Assembly, September 24, 2014
      • Rafael Correa >
        • About Rafael Correa
        • Speech at CELAC 1/29/2015
        • Speech at Summit of the Americas 2015
      • Nicolás Maduro
      • Cristina Fernández
      • Cuban Ministry of Foreign Relations >
        • Statement at re-opening of Cuban Embassy in USA, June 20, 2015
        • The visit of Barack Obama to Cuba
        • Declaration on parliamentary coup in Brazil, August 31, 2016
        • Declaration of the Revolutionary Government of Cuba on Venezuela, April 13, 2019
      • ALBA >
        • Declaration of ALBA Political Council, May 21, 2019
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 17, 2015
        • Declaration on Venezuela, April 10, 2017
      • Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) >
        • Havana Declaration 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 26
    • Martin Luther King, Jr.
    • International >
      • Peoples’ Summit 2015
      • The Group of 77 >
        • Declaration on a New World Order 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela 3/26/2015
      • BRICS
      • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Readings
    • Charles McKelvey, Cuba in Global Context
    • Piero Gleijeses, Cuba and Africa
    • Charles McKelvey, Chávez and the Revolution in Venezuela
    • Charles McKelvey, The unfinished agenda of race in USA
    • Charles McKelvey, Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist Revolutionary
  • Recommended Books
  • Contact

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Recommended books on Amazon.com; click on image of book to connect

Pope Francis: Care for our Common Home

12/14/2015

0 Comments

 
     Catholic social thought during the nineteenth century viewed secularism as the source of modern problems, for it divorced the political process from moral teachings rooted in divine revelation. Catholic social thought condemned the excessive individualism of capitalism, and it called for a restoration of the organic unity of society through the reconciliation of society with the Church (O’Brian and Shannon 1977:31).

     As a result of its defense of the old order, nineteenth century Catholic social thought was isolated from intellectual currents and social movements.  Seeking to overcome this isolation, Pope Leo XIII, in a series of encyclicals at the end of the century, affirmed the complementarity of reason and revelation.  He criticized liberal capitalism, for its releasing of the individual from moral constraints; and socialism, for its lack of respect for human rights and disregard for the welfare of religion.  In his critique of capitalism, he maintained that wages should be determined not by market forces alone but also by the needs of the worker; and that the right of property should be subjected to moral restraints.  Continuing with these themes, Pope Pius XI in 1931 denounced both liberal capitalism and atheistic communism and called for a middle way, a Christian social order (O’Brian and Shannon 1977:33-37).

     The social teachings of Leo XIII and Pius XI were rigid in theology, and they assumed that the Church possessed the answers to the problems of the age.  As a result, they could not generate a wide following. The later encyclicals of Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI, however, were written with a more humble tone, based on a vision of the Church as a servant of humanity.  Moreover, they engaged the issues that confronted the colonized peoples, affirming the rights of the nations of the Third World to self-determination and to control over their natural resources.  John XXIII, in the 1960 encyclical “Christianity and Social Progress,” affirmed public ownership in response to the demands of the common good, and the right of nations to nationalize.  He condemned the economic dependency of neocolonialism, and he called for a just distribution of wealth.  In the 1967 encyclical “On the Development of Peoples,” Paul VI maintained that private property is not an unconditioned right, and that the common good sometimes demands the expropriation of land.  Following up on the progressive themes of the papal encyclicals, the Synod of Bishops in 1971 issued “Justice in the World.”  It suggests that European colonialism is the cause of Third World underdevelopment, and it maintains that action on behalf of social justice is an integral and necessary component of the Christian life (O’Brian and Shannon 1977).

     On the other hand, the encyclicals of John XXIII and Paul VI sometimes reflect a European point of view (see, for example, O’Brian and Shannon 1977:91, 182-83).  And Paul specifically rejects Marxism, for its atheism, historical materialism, and emphasis on class struggle, including justification of violent forms of struggle (O’Brian and Shannon 1977:366-70).

     The 2015 encyclical of Pope Francis, Laudato Si’, represents a further evolution in Catholic social thought.  It does not have the ethnocentric and anti-Marxist formulations that mar the encyclicals of John XXIII and Paul VI.  Focusing on the need to care for the natural environment, it sees ecological issues as integrally tied to economic, political and cultural global issues, in accordance with the most progressive tendencies today.

     Laudato Si’ laments that “economic powers continue to justify the current global system where priority tends to be given to speculation and the pursuit of financial gain.”  In contrast to this systemic defense of profit, the Pope maintain that moral constraints must be placed on the right of private property, if the environment is to be protected.
Whether believers or not, we are agreed today that the earth is essentially a shared inheritance, whose fruits are meant to benefit everyone. . . .  Hence every ecological approach needs to incorporate a social perspective which takes into account the fundamental rights of the poor and the underprivileged. The principle of the subordination of private property to the universal destination of goods, and thus the right of everyone to their use, is a golden rule of social conduct and “the first principle of the whole ethical and social order” [citing John Paul II].  The Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property. Saint John Paul II forcefully reaffirmed this teaching, stating that “God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members, without excluding or favouring anyone.” These are strong words. He noted that “a type of development which did not respect and promote human rights – personal and social, economic and political, including the rights of nations and of peoples – would not be really worthy of man.”
     The Pope criticizes a one-dimensional epistemological paradigm that exalts rational control over an external object.  He maintains that this technocratic paradigm tends to dominate economic life.  “The economy accepts every advance in technology with a view to profit, without concern for its potentially negative impact on human beings.”  He calls for the promotion of a different cultural paradigm that seeks to limit and direct technology, placing it in “the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more human, more social, more integral.”  

     Alongside the technocratic paradigm, there is a “culture of relativism.” The validity of “objective truths” and “sound principles” is denied, except for the principle of “the satisfaction of our own desires and immediate needs.”  This leads us to place no limits on human behavior and to allow “the invisible forces of the market to regulate the economy,” disregarding their impact on society and nature.  Francis calls for a perspective that is rooted in the fundamental principle of the common good, which calls us to solidarity and to a preferential option for the poor that demands “an appreciation of the immense dignity of the poor.”  

     The Pope advocates an integral approach to ecology that takes into account economy, society, and culture.  “What is needed is a politics which is far-sighted and capable of a new, integral and interdisciplinary approach to handling the different aspects of the crisis.”

     Pope Francis affirms a positive possibility for humanity, rooted in human dignity.
Human beings, while capable of the worst, are also capable of rising above themselves, choosing again what is good, and making a new start, despite their mental and social conditioning. We are able to take an honest look at ourselves, to acknowledge our deep dissatisfaction, and to embark on new paths to authentic freedom. No system can completely suppress our openness to what is good, true and beautiful, or our God-given ability to respond to his grace at work deep in our hearts. I appeal to everyone throughout the world not to forget this dignity which is ours.
​    The progressive Christianity of Pope Francis and Socialism for the Twenty-First Century are different, for the Pope calls political leaders to conform to fundamental moral principles, whereas Socialism for the Twenty-First Century places its hope not in the moral conversion of politicians but in the taking of power by the people, who will develop moral policies in defense of its own interests, which are the common interests of humanity.  But the two complement one another, such that an alliance is emerging.  This will be the subject of our next post. 


​References
 
Encyclical Letter, Laudato Si’, of the Holy Father Francis, “On Care for our Common Home.”
 
O’Brian, David and Thomas A. Shannon, Eds.  1977.  Renewing the Earth: Catholic Documents on Peace, Justice and Liberation.  Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Image Books.

 
Key words:  Third World, revolution, colonialism, neocolonialism, imperialism, democracy, national liberation, sovereignty, self-determination, socialism, Marxism, Leninism, Cuba, Latin America, world-system, world-economy, development, underdevelopment, colonial, neocolonial, blog Third World perspective, Pope Francis, Christianity, ecology

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author: Charles McKelvey

    Retired professor, writer,  and Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist revolutionary

    Categories

    All
    American Revolution
    Blog Index
    Bolivia
    Charismatic Leaders
    China
    Critique Of The Left
    Cuban History
    Cuba Today
    Ecuador
    Environment
    French Revolution
    Gay Rights
    Haitian Revolution
    Knowledge
    Latin American History
    Latin American Right
    Latin American Unity
    Marx
    Marxism-Leninism
    Mexican Revolution
    Miscellaneous
    Neocolonialism
    Neoliberalism
    Nicaragua
    North-South Cooperation
    Presidential Elections 2016
    Press
    Public Debate In USA
    Race
    Religion And Revolution
    Revolution
    Russian Revolution
    South-South Cooperation
    Third World
    Trump
    US Ascent
    US Imperialism
    Vanguard
    Venezuela
    Vietnam
    Wallerstein
    Women And Revolution
    World History
    World-System
    World-System Crisis

    Archives

    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

More Ads


website by Sierra Creation