Global Learning
  • Home
  • Defenders of Cuban Socialism
    • UN Charter
    • Declaration of Human Rights
    • Bandung
    • New International Economic Order
    • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Substack editorial column
  • New Cold War articles
  • Friends of Socialist China articles
  • Global Research articles
  • Counterpunch articles
  • Cuba and the world-system
    • Table of Contents and chapter summaries
    • About the author
    • Endorsements
    • Obtaining your copy
  • Blog ¨The View from the South¨
    • Blog Index
    • Posts in reverse chronological order
  • The Voice of Third World Leaders
    • Asia >
      • Ho Chi Minh
      • Xi Jinping, President of China
    • Africa >
      • Kwame Nkrumah
      • Julius Nyerere
    • Latin America >
      • Fidel Castro
      • Hugo Chávez
      • Raúl Castro >
        • 55th anniversary speech, January 1, 1914
        • Opening Speech, CELAC
        • Address at G-77, June 15, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, July 5, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, December 20, 2014
        • Speech on Venezuela at ALBA, 3-17-2015
        • Declaration of December 18, 2015 on USA-Cuba relations
        • Speech at ALBA, March 5, 2018
      • Miguel Díaz-Canel >
        • UN address, September 26, 2018
        • 100th annivesary, CP of China
      • Evo Morales >
        • About Evo Morales
        • Address to G-77 plus China, January 8, 2014
        • Address to UN General Assembly, September 24, 2014
      • Rafael Correa >
        • About Rafael Correa
        • Speech at CELAC 1/29/2015
        • Speech at Summit of the Americas 2015
      • Nicolás Maduro
      • Cristina Fernández
      • Cuban Ministry of Foreign Relations >
        • Statement at re-opening of Cuban Embassy in USA, June 20, 2015
        • The visit of Barack Obama to Cuba
        • Declaration on parliamentary coup in Brazil, August 31, 2016
        • Declaration of the Revolutionary Government of Cuba on Venezuela, April 13, 2019
      • ALBA >
        • Declaration of ALBA Political Council, May 21, 2019
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 17, 2015
        • Declaration on Venezuela, April 10, 2017
      • Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) >
        • Havana Declaration 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 26
    • Martin Luther King, Jr.
    • International >
      • Peoples’ Summit 2015
      • The Group of 77 >
        • Declaration on a New World Order 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela 3/26/2015
      • BRICS
      • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Readings
    • Charles McKelvey, Cuba in Global Context
    • Piero Gleijeses, Cuba and Africa
    • Charles McKelvey, Chávez and the Revolution in Venezuela
    • Charles McKelvey, The unfinished agenda of race in USA
    • Charles McKelvey, Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist Revolutionary
  • Recommended Books
  • Contact

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Recommended books on Amazon.com; click on image of book to connect

Liberals or revolutionaries?

3/28/2014

0 Comments

 
Posted April 7, 2014

​     In his essays on liberalism, published as a collection in After Liberalism (1995), Wallerstein presents a panoramic view of the ideologies of the modern era, using ideology here not in the sense of legitimations of domination (see “Domination and ideology” 3/31/2014), but in the sense of the formulation of a long-term political agenda (see “Wallerstein on Liberalism” 4/6/2014). 

     I am not in agreement with Wallerstein’s overview of ideological developments in the modern world-system.  Our differences in interpretation lead us to divergent interpretations concerning the significance of ideological and political developments in the Third World today.

       In critiquing Wallerstein’s panoramic overview of ideological developments, I begin by maintaining that a distinction must be made between Third World national liberation movements that are revolutionary and those that are moderate.  In his second book on Africa, published in 1967, Wallerstein discusses the differences between revolutionary and moderate nationalist movements and nations with respect to the concept of African socialism, presenting presidents Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Ben Bella of Algeria, and Modibo Keita of Mali as outspoken representatives of the revolutionary camp (2005:II 230-36).  But in an article on the social roots of different tendencies in African nationalism originally published in 1970, he does not mention revolutionary African nationalism (1986:13-35).  In his later essays on liberalism, Wallerstein does not consistently maintain a distinction between Third World nationalist movements that are moderate and those that are revolutionary.

      But in analyzing the significance of Third World national liberation movements, the distinction between moderate and revolutionary movements is necessary.  The former are oriented toward cooperation with the neocolonial powers, which includes above all the maintenance of the core-peripheral relation established during colonialism, and as a result, governments with a moderate nationalist orientation have limited possibilities for the improvement of the standard of living of the people.  In contrast, revolutionary leaders have sought to break the neocolonial relation and to place the nation on a path of autonomous development.  Their political agenda has not been the promotion of the interests of the elite within the neocolony. They violated the rules of the system and were declared anathema by the global powers.  They therefore had to maintain the support of the people in order to survive.  Thus, the protection of the social and economic rights of the people was in their interests, reinforcing their personal commitment to revolutionary values, a commitment that brought them to the head of the revolutionary movement as it was unfolding. 

      Some revolutionary projects did not last long or could not succeed in breaking the neocolonial relation: Nkrumah in Ghana, Ben Bella in Algeria, Nyerere in Tanzania, and Allende in Chile.  Others have endured: Mao in China, Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam, and Fidel in Cuba.  In our analysis of the world-system, both short-lived and long-lasting revolutionary governments should be placed in a separate analytical category, distinct from moderate Third World governments.  Whereas the latter at most challenged the global powers in order to defend national projects of ascent within the structures of the world-system, the former challenged the structures of the system itself.  With respect to Third World revolutionary governments, we must ask questions such as: What theories, methods, and strategies did they have?  What constellation of forces made it possible for them take power and/or to maintain themselves in power?  What obstacles did they confront?  What achievements did they have?  To what extent have they been able to maintain popular support?  What lessons can we learn from their experiences?  What are the implications of their achievements for the development of a more just and democratic world-system?  

      Viewing the revolutionary Third World governments as a distinct category, some general observations can be made.  China, Vietnam and Cuba have persisted in their socialist revolutions, each making changes as they adjusted to dynamic national and international forces and conditions.  They are joined today by other nations that have proclaimed socialism for the twenty-first century: Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador.  Domestically, all have attained high levels of political participation and political stability.  All have significant gains in the protection of the social and economic rights of the people. Internationally, all have developed foreign policies that reflect independence from the demands of the neocolonial powers.  All are developing relations with nations that have progressive governments, such as Argentina and Brazil.  They are forming mutually beneficial economic, commercial, social, and cultural relations, based on respect for the sovereignty of all nations.  They are self-consciously developing in practice an alternative model for relations among nations, fundamentally different from the exploitative relations that characterize the neocolonial world-system.  In a historic moment in which the world-system experiences structural crisis and bifurcation, the domestic and international policies of the revolutionary governments suggest a possible option for a resolution of the crisis and a restoration of global equilibrium: the development of an alternative more just and democratic world-system.  Whereas Wallerstein sees the emergence of an alternative socialist civilizational project as a possibility, I take this further.  I maintain that an alternative project is in fact emerging in the Third World, that this can be seen through cross-horizon encounter (see “Universal philosophical historical social science” 4/2/3014), and that intellectuals of the North have the duty to engage in cross-horizon encounter and to do intellectual work that contributes to the theoretical development and political advance of the alternative project.

      Wallerstein maintains that the four fiercely autonomous nations are against the system but of the system.  Indeed so.  One of the characteristics of Third World national liberation movements has been their appropriation of Western values that are consistent with their interests, transforming and adapting them to the colonial situation.  Like Thomas Jefferson, they believe that there are self-evident truths.  They declare that no nation has the right to conquer peoples and nations and to impose forced labor; and no nation has the right to intervene in the affairs of others, manipulating its political processes in order to protect particular interests.  Thus, they share epistemological premises and basic values with Jefferson, but they have transformed his ideas, expanding and deepening the meaning of democracy, in accordance with the requirements of the colonial situation.  So Third World revolutionary nationalist leaders are of the system, in that they have appropriated its most humanistic values.  But they are against the system, in that the changes that they seek, if implemented, would imply a change in fundamental structures, converting the world-system into a different world-system.  And they envision this transformation as being carried out by the peoples of the world in movement, who have taken control or will take control of various governments in peripheral and semi-peripheral regions.  They therefore possess the defining characteristics of revolutionaries: they seek a fundamental structural change carried out by popular sectors that yesterday were excluded from power but that now have taken control of the state.  Like liberals, they envision this transformation as occurring step-by-step, reflecting a realistic understanding that neither the nation nor the world can be transformed in a day.  But unlike liberals, their aspirations are not constrained by a desire to preserve the privileges of a minority.  They are constrained only by a sensibility toward what is politically possible in a given situation and by respect for universal human values. These characteristics of revolutionary Third World nationalists differentiate them from liberals.

     The unfolding Third World movement does not seek concessions to the popular classes in order to promote the stability of the world system; it seeks to replace governments controlled by representatives of international corporations with governments formed by delegates of the people.  It seeks not the ascent of a peripheral or semi-peripheral nation in the world-system; it seeks the abolition of the core-peripheral relation and the establishment of an alternative logic of cooperation among nations and solidarity among peoples.  It is lifting up charismatic leaders who are not liberals but revolutionaries.


References

Wallerstein, Immanuel.  1986.  Africa and the Modern World.  Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

__________.  1995. After Liberalism. New York: The New Press.

__________.  2005.  Africa: The Politics of Independence and Unity.  Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.  [Combines into one edition Africa: The Politics of Independence (1961) and Africa: The Politics of Unity (1967)].


Key words: Third World, revolution, colonialism, neocolonialism, imperialism, democracy, national liberation, sovereignty, self-determination, socialism, Marxism, Leninism, Cuba, Latin America, world-system, world-economy, development, underdevelopment, colonial, neocolonial, blog Third World perspective, Wallerstein, world-systems analysis, liberalism
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author: Charles McKelvey

    Retired professor, writer,  and Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist revolutionary

    Categories

    All
    American Revolution
    Blog Index
    Bolivia
    Charismatic Leaders
    China
    Critique Of The Left
    Cuban History
    Cuba Today
    Ecuador
    Environment
    French Revolution
    Gay Rights
    Haitian Revolution
    Knowledge
    Latin American History
    Latin American Right
    Latin American Unity
    Marx
    Marxism-Leninism
    Mexican Revolution
    Miscellaneous
    Neocolonialism
    Neoliberalism
    Nicaragua
    North-South Cooperation
    Presidential Elections 2016
    Press
    Public Debate In USA
    Race
    Religion And Revolution
    Revolution
    Russian Revolution
    South-South Cooperation
    Third World
    Trump
    US Ascent
    US Imperialism
    Vanguard
    Venezuela
    Vietnam
    Wallerstein
    Women And Revolution
    World History
    World-System
    World-System Crisis

    Archives

    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

More Ads


website by Sierra Creation