Global Learning
  • Home
  • Defenders of Cuban Socialism
    • UN Charter
    • Declaration of Human Rights
    • Bandung
    • New International Economic Order
    • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Substack editorial column
  • New Cold War articles
  • Friends of Socialist China articles
  • Global Research articles
  • Counterpunch articles
  • Cuba and the world-system
    • Table of Contents and chapter summaries
    • About the author
    • Endorsements
    • Obtaining your copy
  • Blog ¨The View from the South¨
    • Blog Index
    • Posts in reverse chronological order
  • The Voice of Third World Leaders
    • Asia >
      • Ho Chi Minh
      • Xi Jinping, President of China
    • Africa >
      • Kwame Nkrumah
      • Julius Nyerere
    • Latin America >
      • Fidel Castro
      • Hugo Chávez
      • Raúl Castro >
        • 55th anniversary speech, January 1, 1914
        • Opening Speech, CELAC
        • Address at G-77, June 15, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, July 5, 2014
        • Address to National Assembly, December 20, 2014
        • Speech on Venezuela at ALBA, 3-17-2015
        • Declaration of December 18, 2015 on USA-Cuba relations
        • Speech at ALBA, March 5, 2018
      • Miguel Díaz-Canel >
        • UN address, September 26, 2018
        • 100th annivesary, CP of China
      • Evo Morales >
        • About Evo Morales
        • Address to G-77 plus China, January 8, 2014
        • Address to UN General Assembly, September 24, 2014
      • Rafael Correa >
        • About Rafael Correa
        • Speech at CELAC 1/29/2015
        • Speech at Summit of the Americas 2015
      • Nicolás Maduro
      • Cristina Fernández
      • Cuban Ministry of Foreign Relations >
        • Statement at re-opening of Cuban Embassy in USA, June 20, 2015
        • The visit of Barack Obama to Cuba
        • Declaration on parliamentary coup in Brazil, August 31, 2016
        • Declaration of the Revolutionary Government of Cuba on Venezuela, April 13, 2019
      • ALBA >
        • Declaration of ALBA Political Council, May 21, 2019
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 17, 2015
        • Declaration on Venezuela, April 10, 2017
      • Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) >
        • Havana Declaration 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela, March 26
    • Martin Luther King, Jr.
    • International >
      • Peoples’ Summit 2015
      • The Group of 77 >
        • Declaration on a New World Order 2014
        • Declaration on Venezuela 3/26/2015
      • BRICS
      • Non-Aligned Movement
  • Readings
    • Charles McKelvey, Cuba in Global Context
    • Piero Gleijeses, Cuba and Africa
    • Charles McKelvey, Chávez and the Revolution in Venezuela
    • Charles McKelvey, The unfinished agenda of race in USA
    • Charles McKelvey, Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist Revolutionary
  • Recommended Books
  • Contact

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Recommended books on Amazon.com; click on image of book to connect

Connecting to the needs of our people

5/11/2016

0 Comments

 
     Today’s post is the third in a series of six posts reflecting on Mitchel Cohen’s concept of direct action, which Mitchel formulates in his 2013 book, What is Direct Action? Reframing Revolutionary Strategy in Light of Occupy Wall Street.  

     Mitchel maintains that the failure of the Left to provide “direct action communities of resistance and nurturance” has the consequence that people turn to fascist and rights wing groups in order to provide for their social-psychological need for community and for meaning (Cohen 2013: 180, 250-51, 310-16).  “The Left preaches against fascism while providing no coherent framework for activities that could cut into fascism’s appeal” (Cohen 2013: 312).

      I think that this is an important observation by Mitchel.  Drawing upon the work of Leon Trotsky, Mitchel discerns that fascism responds to a need established by anxieties and fears provoked by the dislocations of capitalism.  This is why both fascism and socialism gain in influence as crises occur.

     I am in agreement with Mitchel that the appeal of the Left would be greatly enhanced if it were to organize activities in which people could be involved.  Such activities could include the kind of direct action projects that Mitchel advocates, and it also could include some activities that Mitchel mentions only in passing: sports teams, political groups, alternative discussion groups, community centers and legal counseling (Cohen 2013: 251).

     But addressing the social-psychological needs of the people requires not only involving people directly in activities; it also requires the formulation of a political program that addresses the concrete needs of the people.  If we study triumphant socialist revolutions, we see that leaders were skillful in formulating a proposed program of action that responded to the frustrations that the people experienced in their daily lives.  In the case of Lenin, the slogans that captured the people were peace, land to the peasants, and power to the popular councils (see “The Russian Revolution (October)” 1/23/2014).  In the case of Fidel, the concrete proposals included the ceding of land to tenant farmers, the sharing of profits by workers in industry and mining, increasing small farmers’ share of the sugar yield, nationalization of foreign companies that charge exorbitant rates, and just punishment for corrupt government officials (see “The Moncada program for the people” 9/5/2014 and “Reflections on ‘History will absolve me’” 9/8/2014 in the category Cuban History).  When popular revolutions move forward under the guidance of charismatic leadership, the people become involved in the revolution, providing them with a sense of belonging and meaning in life.

     But the US Left has not formulated a program of action that connects to the needs of the people.  In the first place, that Left has jumped from issue to issue, rather than formulating a coherent plan. Moreover, the Left has framed a number of these issues in ways that are insensitive to the concepts, values, religious sentiments, and patriotism of the people.  From 1967 to the present, the Left has not been creative and sensitive in the formulation of its concepts, and thus it has not demonstrated an affinity with the concerns and aspirations of the people.  And as a result, it has not convinced the people that it is prepared to make any sacrifice necessary in the people’s defense.  It has failed to formulate a national project that can unify our people into a great movement.

     The formulation of a coherent program that connects to the people is precisely the challenge of leadership.  When revolutions take-off, it is because charismatic leaders have emerged to offer a plan of the people, of which the people previously had a sense but were unable to formulate.  When charismatic leaders emerge, a vanguard begins to take shape, educating the people and exhorting the people to sacrifice in their own defense.

     Popular revolutions, therefore, are to some extent top-down.  They involve leaders who teach, exhort, clarify and unify.  But they also are bottom-up.  For the gift of charismatic leaders is precisely their intimacy with the people, their understanding of the people’s needs, their capacity to formulate a plan for addressing the needs of the people, and their boundless commitment to the people; qualities that the people see.

     Yes, as Mitchel argues, we must offer our people the chance to be involved in direct action projects and the creation of communities of resistance, and in doing so, we would undermine the appeal of fascism.  But we also must formulate a program of action, an alternative national project, rooted in the historic values of popular movements in the United States.  This would unify us, overcome our confusion, and lead us forward.  If we study the history of revolutions, we see that the formulation of an alternative national plan is what charismatic leaders do.

      As an old intellectual who has seen the glory of the Third World revolution, I call for the emergence of charismatic leaders in the United States, younger men and women of all classes and colors.  Leaders with the discipline to do the intellectual work necessary for understanding the fundamental dynamics of human history, overcoming the ideological distortions that they have been taught. Leaders with a capacity to explain the dynamics of the nation in a global and historical context, and who can formulate a comprehensive plan of action that connects to the needs of all of the people, voicing the needs of each popular sector with sensitivity to the concerns of other sectors.  Leaders who can unify the people and lead them in the quest for the taking of power and in societal transformation.  I know that such leaders are present, perhaps without fully understanding it, for they are present in all lands.  Your time has come!  

     For further posts on this theme, see “A socialist revolution in the USA” 2/1/2016; “Lessons of socialism for the USA” 1/18/2016; “Popular democratic socialist revolution” 1/15/2016; and “Presidential primaries in USA” 8/25/2015.  They can be found in the category Revolution. 

​Reference

 
Cohen, Mitchel, et.al.  2013.  What is Direct Action?  Reframing Revolutionary Strategy in Light of Occupy Wall Street.  Brooklyn: Red Balloon Collective Publications.

 
 Key words: socialism, fascism, direct action, social psychology, human needs
 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author: Charles McKelvey

    Retired professor, writer,  and Marxist-Leninist-Fidelist-Chavist revolutionary

    Categories

    All
    American Revolution
    Blog Index
    Bolivia
    Charismatic Leaders
    China
    Critique Of The Left
    Cuban History
    Cuba Today
    Ecuador
    Environment
    French Revolution
    Gay Rights
    Haitian Revolution
    Knowledge
    Latin American History
    Latin American Right
    Latin American Unity
    Marx
    Marxism-Leninism
    Mexican Revolution
    Miscellaneous
    Neocolonialism
    Neoliberalism
    Nicaragua
    North-South Cooperation
    Presidential Elections 2016
    Press
    Public Debate In USA
    Race
    Religion And Revolution
    Revolution
    Russian Revolution
    South-South Cooperation
    Third World
    Trump
    US Ascent
    US Imperialism
    Vanguard
    Venezuela
    Vietnam
    Wallerstein
    Women And Revolution
    World History
    World-System
    World-System Crisis

    Archives

    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    January 2013

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

More Ads


website by Sierra Creation